Newsgroups Main » Newsgroups Directory » Computers – OS and Platforms » Microsoft windows

Garnet user interface ( comp.windows.garnet )
spacer NewsDemon Usenet 2024 Access
 
From [email protected] Sun Jun  7 15:12:55 1992 Xref: uunet news.announce.newgroups:2403 news.groups:52127 comp.windows.misc:3540 comp.lang.lisp:7304 comp.human-factors:2191 Newsgroups: news.announce.newgroups,news.groups,comp.windows.misc,comp.lang.lisp,comp.human-factors Path: uunet!bounce-back From: [email protected] (Brad Myers) Subject: RFD: comp.windows.garnet Message-ID: <[email protected]> Followup-To: news.groups Sender: [email protected] (David C Lawrence) Organization: School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon Date: Thu, 4 Jun 1992 19:14:04 GMT Approved: [email protected] Lines: 27  I propose that the garnet-users mailing list be turned into a new Internet newsgroup.  Garnet is a user interface development environment (which might also be called a toolkit, interface builder, user interface management system (UIMS), etc.) for X/11 and Common Lisp. The motivation to forming the group is that it is getting to be a quite large mailing list (about 300-400 people) and there seem to be many people interested in the system who would like to browse the discussions, but not get all the mail.  I propose that the new group be named comp.windows.garnet (to be parallel with comp.windows.interviews, since interviews is a similar kind of system to Garnet).  This group will be for the discussion about bugs, features, and questions about Garnet.  I propose that it NOT be moderated.  The current traffic on the garnet-users mailing list is about 2 or 3 messages per day, but the number of Garnet users continually increases so the volumn might increase also.   More information on Garnet is available from me.  Thank you for your consideration,  Brad A. Myers --  School of Computer Science                      (412) 268-5150 Carnegie Mellon University                      FAX: (412) 681-5739 5000 Forbes Avenue                              [email protected] Pittsburgh, PA  15213-3890  From [email protected] Wed Jul  8 15:17:20 1992 Xref: uunet news.announce.newgroups:2509 news.groups:53903 comp.windows.misc:3623 comp.lang.lisp:7551 comp.human-factors:2333 Newsgroups: news.announce.newgroups,news.groups,comp.windows.misc,comp.lang.lisp,comp.human-factors Path: uunet!bounce-back From: [email protected] (Brad Myers) Subject: CFV: comp.windows.garnet Message-ID: <[email protected]> Followup-To: poster Sender: [email protected] (David C Lawrence) Organization: School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon Date: Wed, 8 Jul 1992 17:52:24 GMT Approved: [email protected] Lines: 45  One month ago I proposed that the garnet-users mailing list be turned into a new Internet newsgroup called comp.windows.garnet.  There was minimal discussion, and all comments were positive.  Therefore, I would like to now call for a vote.  On the matter of creating a new internet newsgroup called comp.windows.garnet:  	To vote YES, send mail to [email protected] 	To vote NO,  send mail to [email protected]  The contents of your message will be ignored and can be empty.  All votes must be received by August 6, 1992.  As per the rules, if there are more than 100 yes votes than no votes by that date AND at least 2/3 of the total number of valid votes received are yes votes, the newsgroup will be created.  NOTE: Even if the newsgroup is created, we will still maintain an e-mail distribution for those who cannot access the newsgroup.  Description:  Garnet is a user interface development environment (other terms include toolkit, interface builder, user interface management system (UIMS), etc.) for X/11 and Common Lisp.  The motivation to forming the newsgroup is that it is getting to be a quite large mailing list (about 300-400 people) and there seem to be many people interested in the system who would like to browse the discussions, but not get all the mail.  The new group be named comp.windows.garnet (to be parallel with comp.windows.interviews, since Interviews is a similar kind of system to Garnet).  This group will be for the discussion about bugs, features, and questions about Garnet.  It will NOT be moderated.  The current traffic on the garnet-users mailing list is about 4 or 5 messages per day, but the number of Garnet users continually increases.  More information on Garnet is available from me. --  Brad A. Myers                           School of Computer Science Carnegie Mellon University              (412) 268-5150 5000 Forbes Avenue                      FAX: (412) 681-5739 Pittsburgh, PA  15213-3890              [email protected]  From [email protected] Thu Jul 16 12:00:32 1992 Xref: uunet news.announce.newgroups:2528 news.groups:54256 comp.lang.lisp:7590 comp.human-factors:2381 comp.windows.x:55865 Newsgroups: news.announce.newgroups,news.groups,comp.lang.lisp,comp.human-factors,comp.windows.x Path: uunet!bounce-back From: [email protected] (Brad Myers) Subject: 2nd CFV: comp.windows.garnet Message-ID: <[email protected]> Followup-To: poster Sender: [email protected] (David C Lawrence) Organization: School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon Date: Wed, 15 Jul 1992 22:15:41 GMT Approved: [email protected] Lines: 46  This is the second Call for Votes (CFV) for the new newgroup comp.windows.garnet.  All votes so far were automatically answered. If you voted and did not receive a response, then please mail again.  On the matter of creating a new internet newsgroup called comp.windows.garnet:  	To vote YES, send mail to [email protected] 	To vote NO,  send mail to [email protected]  The contents of your message will be ignored and can be empty.  All votes must be received by August 6, 1992.  As per the rules, if there are more than 100 yes votes than no votes by that date AND at least 2/3 of the total number of valid votes received are yes votes, the newsgroup will be created.  NOTE: Even if the newsgroup is created, we will still maintain an e-mail distribution for those who cannot access the newsgroup.  Description:  Garnet is a user interface development environment (other terms include toolkit, interface builder, user interface management system (UIMS), etc.) for X/11 and Common Lisp.  The motivation to forming the newsgroup is that it is getting to be a quite large mailing list (about 300-400 people) and there seem to be many people interested in the system who would like to browse the discussions, but not get all the mail.  The new group will be named comp.windows.garnet (to be parallel with comp.windows.interviews, since Interviews is a similar kind of system to Garnet).  This group will be for the discussion about bugs, features, and questions about Garnet.  It will NOT be moderated.  The current traffic on the garnet-users mailing list is about 4 or 5 messages per day, but the number of Garnet users continually increases.  More information on Garnet is available from me.  Brad A. Myers --  School of Computer Science                      (412) 268-5150 Carnegie Mellon University                      FAX: (412) 681-5739 5000 Forbes Avenue                              [email protected] Pittsburgh, PA  15213-3890  From [email protected] Fri Aug  7 20:55:51 1992 Xref: uunet news.announce.newgroups:2606 news.groups:55142 comp.human-factors:2492 comp.lang.lisp:7723 Newsgroups: news.announce.newgroups,news.groups,comp.human-factors,comp.lang.lisp Path: uunet!bounce-back From: [email protected] (Brad Myers) Subject: RESULT: comp.windows.garnet passes 220: 18 Message-ID: <[email protected]> Followup-To: news.groups Sender: [email protected] (David C Lawrence) Organization: School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon Date: Fri, 7 Aug 1992 23:34:22 GMT Approved: [email protected] Lines: 246  The vote to create comp.windows.garnet passes 220 yes to 18 no.  Here are  the votes:  YES votes:  1. "Dan Corkill, COINS, UMass 413/545-0156" <[email protected]> 2. "Josef G. Schreiner" <[email protected]> 3. "Kai-Mikael J\d\d-Aro" <[email protected]> 4. "Kurt Indermaur" <[email protected]> 5. "Martin J. Zaidel" <[email protected]> 6. "Penner Robin" <[email protected]> 7. "Randy Fischer" <[email protected]> 8. "The TDL Fopra" <[email protected]> 9. "Ulrich Schaefer" <[email protected]> 10. 408)922-2768 <[email protected]  11. <[email protected]> 12. <[email protected]> 13. <[email protected]> 14. [email protected] 15. Alan Ruttenberg <[email protected]> 16. Alan Teague <[email protected]> 17. Alberto Riva <[email protected]> 18. Alejandro Caro <[email protected]> 19. Alok Mathur  <[email protected]> 20. [email protected] 21. Anne Judith Rose <[email protected]> 22. B C Desai <[email protected]> 23. Bala Srinivasan <[email protected]> 24. Bill Bohrer <[email protected]> 25. Bill Poutinen <[email protected]> 26. Billy Joel <[email protected]> 27. Bob Jackson <[email protected]> 28. [email protected] on Wed, Jul 15, 1992 11:37 AM 29. Brent Benson <[email protected]> 30. Bryan M Kramer <[email protected]> 31. [email protected] <[email protected]> 32. [email protected] 33. Ceri Hopkins <[email protected]> 34. Charlie Lindahl <[email protected]> 35. Cheuk-San Wang <[email protected]> 36. Chris Esposito <[email protected]> 37. Chris Richardson <[email protected]> 38. Christophe MERTZ "CR2A" <[email protected]> 39. Chuck Grant <[email protected]> 40. Clifford Ritchie <[email protected]> 41. Conrad Poelman <[email protected]> 42. Dan Cerys <[email protected]> 43. Dan McCrobie <[email protected]> 44. [email protected] 45. Dave Brooks <[email protected]> 46. Dave Love <[email protected]> 47. Dave Pugmire <[email protected]> 48. David Axmark <[email protected]> 49. David M Chelberg <[email protected]> 50. Denis Anthony <[email protected]> 51. Denys Duchier <[email protected]> 52. Detlef Schwier <[email protected]> 53. Dipankar Gupta <[email protected]> 54. Don Hopkins <[email protected]> 55. Donald Beaudry <[email protected]> 56. Doug "D." Dankel <[email protected]> 57. Edward K. Lee <[email protected]> 58. [email protected] 59. Erick Gallesio <[email protected]> 60. Erik Altmann <[email protected]> 61. Fernando Mato Mira <[email protected]> 62. Frank R Smith <[email protected]> 63. [email protected] 64. George Kutty <[email protected]> 65. Glenn S. Elias <[email protected]> 66. Gordon Buxton <[email protected]> 67. Guido Knappe <[email protected]> 68. Gyesung Lee <[email protected]> 69. Harri Ilmari Poyhonen <[email protected]> 70. Harris, Jed <[email protected]> 71. Herbert Damker    <[email protected]> 72. Howard Beck <[email protected]> 73. Hubertus Hohl <[email protected]> 74. Ian Rogers <[email protected]> 75. [email protected] 76. Ingemar Hulthage [email protected]> 77. Ivan Tou <[email protected]> 78. James Ault <[email protected]> 79. James Landay <[email protected]> 80. James Salsman <[email protected]> 81. James Tizard <[email protected]> 82. Jeff Dalton <[email protected]> 83. Jeff Putnam <[email protected]> 84. Jim Davis <[email protected]> 85. Jim Mayer <[email protected]> 86. Joe Konstan <[email protected]> 87. John Gibbons <[email protected]> 88. John Richards <[email protected]> 89. John Sambrook <[email protected]> 90. Jon Lieb [email protected]> 91. Jonas Lowgren <[email protected]> 92. Jose E. Hernandez <[email protected]> 93. Josh Fisher <[email protected]> 94. Jost Krieger <[email protected]> 95. Juergen Christoffel <[email protected]> 96. Juergen Theis <[email protected]> 97. Jutta Degener <[email protected]> 98. Karen York Kietzke <[email protected]> 99. Keith Decker <[email protected]> 100. Kenneth J Meltsner <[email protected]> 101. Larry Stone <[email protected]> 102. Len Charest <[email protected]> 103. Lorraine Normore <[email protected]> 104. Lynda L. True <[email protected]> 105. [email protected] 106. Marilyn S Bunzo <[email protected]> 107. Mark Feblowitz [email protected]> 108. Mark Shirley <[email protected]> 109. [email protected] 110. [email protected] 111. Markus Stumpf <[email protected]> 112. Martin Sjolin <[email protected]> 113. Martin Stein <[email protected]> 114. Marty Hall <[email protected]> 115. Masahiro HORI <[email protected]> 116. Masayuki Kuwada <[email protected]> 117. Matthias Ressel <[email protected]> 118. Mattias Werner <[email protected]> 119. Michael Clarkson<[email protected]> 120. Michael Froehlich <[email protected]> 121. Michael Sannella <[email protected]> 122. Michael Twidale <[email protected]> 123. Michael Wirth <[email protected]> 124. Mike Cornelio <[email protected]> 125. Mike Wray <[email protected]> 126. Mustafa Uysal [email protected]> 127. N F Drakos <[email protected]> 128. Oliver Dehning <[email protected]> 129. Omar Patino-Siliceo <[email protected]> 130. [email protected] 131. Patrick Logan <[email protected]> 132. Paul Dourish <[email protected]> 133. Paul Harvey <[email protected]> 134. PeiYu Huang <[email protected]> 135. Peter E. Jones <[email protected]> 136. Peter Halvorson [email protected]> 137. Peter Mikes <[email protected]> 138. Philippe Marchal <[email protected]> 139. Ping Luo <[email protected]> 140. R J Williams <[email protected]> 141. RB Feenstra <[email protected]> 142. Raja Sooriamurthi <[email protected]> 143. Rajan Parthasarathy <[email protected]> 144. Ralph Hill <[email protected]> 145. Ramesh Vaidhyanathan <[email protected]> 146. Raymond Lang <[email protected]> 147. Richard Eaton <[email protected]> 148. Richard Hesketh <[email protected]> 149. Robert Goldman <[email protected]> 150. [email protected] 151. Roman Weissgaerber <[email protected]> 152. Rudolf Keller <[email protected]> 153. Russell G. Almond <[email protected]> 154. Russell Ritchie <[email protected]> 155. SNERG Library <[email protected]> 156. Sanjiva Weerawarana <[email protected]> 157. Sascha Wildner <[email protected]> 158. Scott Blachowicz <[email protected]> 159. Scott Simpson <[email protected]> 160. [email protected] 161. Shon Vick <[email protected]> 162. Siegfried Schreiber <[email protected]> 163. Simon Leinen <[email protected]> 164. Skip Egdorf <[email protected]> 165. Stefan Koser [email protected]> 166. Stefan Vaillant <[email protected]> 167. Stephen E. Miner <[email protected]> 168. Stephen [Steve] Smoot <[email protected]> 169. Steve Berson <[email protected]> 170. Steve Talbots <[email protected]> 171. [email protected] 172. Thierry Besancon <[email protected]> 173. [email protected] 174. Tim Bradshaw <[email protected]> 175. Tom Canales <[email protected]> 176. Tom Moore <[email protected]> 177. Tom Zheng <[email protected]> 178. Vijay Saraswat <[email protected]> 179. [email protected] 180. Vladimir Bacvanski <[email protected]> 181. Wolfgang Pohl <[email protected]> 182. Y S Ramakrishna <[email protected]> 183. Yaw "O." Busia <[email protected]> 184. Ye Huang <[email protected]> 185. [email protected] 186. [email protected] 187. [email protected] 188. [email protected] 189. [email protected] 190. chuk <[email protected]> 191. dan pierson <[email protected]> 192. [email protected] 193. [email protected] 194. gringhuis <[email protected]> 195. [email protected] 196. [email protected] 197. john blue <[email protected]> 198. [email protected] 199. [email protected] 200. [email protected] 201. [email protected] 202. [email protected] 203. [email protected] 204. [email protected] 205. [email protected] 206. [email protected] 207. [email protected] 208. prc <[email protected]> 209. rmd <[email protected]> 210. [email protected] 211. ruman <[email protected]> 212. [email protected] 213. [email protected] 214. [email protected] 215. [email protected] 216. smacalde%[email protected] 217. [email protected] 218. [email protected] 219. william m perkins <[email protected]> 220. yost <[email protected]>  NO Votes  1. Bill Owens <[email protected]> 2. Carl Rigney <[email protected]> 3. David Barr <[email protected]> 4. Ed McGuire <[email protected]> 5. John G Dobnick <[email protected]> 6. Kim DeVaughn <[email protected]> 7. Leonard J. Peirce <[email protected]> 8. M J Sawar <[email protected]> 9. Paul Sears "Sys Admin" <[email protected]> 10. Richard H. Miller <[email protected]> 11. Steve Rogers <[email protected]> 12. Sven Heinicke <[email protected]> 13. Ted Koppel [email protected]> 14. The Wolfe of the Den <[email protected]> 15. Tim Szeliga <[email protected]> 16. [email protected] 17. [email protected] 18. [email protected]  
 
USENET FACT: Big-8
BIG-8 hierarchies are the 8 traditional top hierarchies of the Usenet. See the following page for more