From [email protected] Thu Sep 17 09:06:10 1992
Xref: uunet news.announce.newgroups:2727 news.groups:56632 comp.realtime:2726 comp.robotics:3102 comp.lang.c:56110 comp.sys.m68k:3359 comp.os.os9:3416 comp.os.misc:2910 comp.lang.ada:8796 comp.os.vxworks:832 comp.sys.sun.hardware:4438
Newsgroups: news.announce.newgroups,news.groups,comp.realtime,comp.robotics,comp.lang.c,comp.sys.m68k,comp.os.os9,comp.os.misc,comp.lang.ada,comp.os.vxworks,comp.sys.sun.hardware
Path: uunet!bounce-back
From: [email protected] (David B Stewart)
Subject: RFD: comp.sys.vmebus
Message-ID:
Followup-To: news.groups
Sender: [email protected] (David C Lawrence)
Organization: The Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 1992 00:09:09 GMT
Approved: [email protected]
Lines: 36
This is a Request For Discussion (RFD) regarding creation of an unmoderated
newsgroup for discussing all aspects of computing related to the VMEbus
and VMEbus-based systems:
comp.sys.vmebus Discussions on hardware and software for VMEbus.
The VMEbus is one of the more popular standards for developing
open-architecture applications based on off-the-shelf hardware. Many hardware
components, operating systems, and applications are based on this standard, yet
there currently is no USENET group where discussions of this standard,
and related items, are appropriate.
The proposal is to create comp.sys.vmebus as a forum for discussing issues
related to developing VMEbus-based systems. This includes discussion on the
VMEbus Specification; VMEbus-based hardware, such as CPU boards and I/O devices;
secondary buses such as VSB, VXI, and VMX; open-architecture applications based
on the VMEbus; and hardware-dependent software, such as device drivers and bus
communication protocols. The group is also available for questions and
answers, so that developers of VMEbus-based hardware and software can get
feedback or help with any problems they may encounter.
Discussions should not be about hardware-independent software which use the
VMEbus, such as the operating system or language being used, as there are other
comp.* newsgroups dedicated to those functions.
The discussion on this proposal will take place in news.groups.
Please see the pertinent postings in news.answers and news.announce.newgroups
for the rules that will be followed in creating a newsgroup
(cf. ).
--
David B. Stewart - email: The Robotics Institute
snail mail: - ECE Dept., Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213
Current Projects: - Chimera 3.0 Real-Time Operating System
- Reconfigurable Sensor-Based Control Systems
From [email protected] Fri Sep 25 12:22:25 1992
Xref: uunet news.announce.newgroups:2771 news.groups:56956 comp.realtime:2764 comp.robotics:3164 comp.lang.c:56467 comp.sys.m68k:3384 comp.os.os9:3443 comp.os.misc:2920 comp.lang.ada:8931 comp.os.vxworks:865 comp.sys.sun.hardware:4603
Newsgroups: news.announce.newgroups,news.groups,comp.realtime,comp.robotics,comp.lang.c,comp.sys.m68k,comp.os.os9,comp.os.misc,comp.lang.ada,comp.os.vxworks,comp.sys.sun.hardware
Path: uunet!bounce-back
From: [email protected] (David B Stewart)
Subject: 2nd RFD: comp.sys.vmebus
Message-ID:
Followup-To: news.groups
Sender: [email protected] (David C Lawrence)
Organization: The Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1992 13:08:57 GMT
Approved: [email protected]
Lines: 66
This is the 2nd Request for Discussion (RFD) regarding creation of an
unmoderated newsgroup 'comp.sys.vmebus' for discussing all aspects of computing
related to the VMEbus and VMEbus-based systems.
So far the following summarizes what has been discussed on news.groups about
the proposed creation of comp.sys.vmebus:
1- No objections yet. Some say this newsgroup is long overdue.
2- Naming the newsgroup 'comp.sys.vme' VS. 'comp.sys.vmebus'.
The shorter name was recommended by one netter, saying that it is a common
abbreviation. However, not everyone agrees since VMEbus is the official
name, and VME is the name of a mainframe operating system. Based on this,
I plan on keeping the name 'comp.sys.vmebus' when we have the Call for
Votes (CFV).
3- One person recommends that the charter of the newgroup be expanded to
include other buses related to VMEbus, such as Futurebus+.
Additional discussion on this point is encouraged.
All discussions should take place in news.groups.
The Call for Votes will occur on Oct. 17 at the earliest, according to the
USENET rules for creating a new newsgroup.
(cf. ).
The original Request for Discussion follows:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a Request for Discussion (RFD) regarding creation of an unmoderated
newsgroup for discussing all aspects of computing related to the VMEbus
and VMEbus-based systems.
comp.sys.vmebus Discussions on hardware & software for VMEbus.
The VMEbus is one of the more popular standards for developing
open-architecture applications based on off-the-shelf hardware. Many hardware
components, operating systems, and applications are based on this standard, yet
there currently is no USENET group where discussions of this standard,
and related items, are appropriate.
The proposal is to create comp.sys.vmebus as a forum for discussing issues
related to developing VMEbus-based systems. This includes discussion on the
VMEbus Specification; VMEbus-based hardware, such as CPU boards and I/O devices;
secondary buses such as VSB, VXI, and VMX; open-architecture applications based
on the VMEbus; and hardware-dependent software, such as device drivers and bus
communication protocols. The group is also available for questions and
answers, so that developers of VMEbus-based hardware and software can get
feedback or help with any problems they may encounter.
Discussions should not be about hardware-independent software which use the
VMEbus, such as the operating system or language being used, as there are other
comp.* newsgroups dedicated to those functions.
The discussion on this proposal will take place in news.groups
Please see the pertinent postings in news.answers and news.announce.newgroups
for the rules that will be followed in creating a newsgroup
().
--
David B. Stewart - email: The Robotics Institute
snail mail: - ECE Dept., Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213
Current Projects: - Chimera 3.0 Real-Time Operating System
- Reconfigurable Sensor-Based Control Systems
From [email protected] Thu Oct 15 22:08:57 1992
Xref: uunet news.announce.newgroups:2834 news.groups:57848 comp.robotics:3356 comp.realtime:2848 comp.lang.c:57425 comp.unix.wizards:7675 comp.sys.m68k:3486 comp.sys.misc:4086 comp.os.os9:3499 comp.lang.ada:9125 comp.os.vxworks:930
Newsgroups: news.announce.newgroups,news.groups,comp.robotics,comp.realtime,comp.sys.sun,comp.lang.c,comp.unix.wizards,comp.sys.m68k,comp.sys.misc,comp.os.os9,comp.lang.ada,comp.os.vxworks
Path: uunet!bounce-back
From: [email protected] (David B Stewart)
Subject: CFV: comp.arch.bus.vmebus
Keywords: VMEbus
Followup-To: poster
Approved: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected] (David C Lawrence)
Organization: The Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 23:52:07 GMT
Message-ID:
Reply-To: [email protected]
Lines: 72
This is a Call for Votes for the creation of a new newsgroup for discussing
VMEbus systems and related topics. The specifics of the proposed newsgroup are
given below, followed by the voting intructions and rules.
Name: comp.arch.bus.vmebus
Purpose: Discussions of hardware and software for VMEbus Systems.
Status: Unmoderated
Charter: The newsgroup 'comp.arch.bus.vmebus' is a forum for discussing
issues related to developing VMEbus-based systems. This
includes discussion of VMEbus-based hardware, such as CPU
boards and I/O devices; the VMEbus specification; any alternate
or secondary buses supported by the VMEbus International Trade
Association (VITA) which includes FutureBus+, VSB, VXI, and
VMX; open-architecture applications based on the VMEbus; and
hardware-dependent software, such as device drivers and bus
communication protocols. The group is also available for
questions and answers, so that developers of VMEbus-based
hardware and software can get feedback or help with any
problems they may encounter.
Discussions should not be about hardware-independent software
which use the VMEbus, such as the operating system or language
being used, as there are other comp.* newsgroups dedicated to
those functions.
Voting Instructions:
All votes should be sent to .
Be sure to include the word "vote" in the subject line.
If you want the group 'comp.arch.bus.vmebus' to be created,
include the text:
"I vote YES for the creation of comp.arch.bus.vmebus."
If you feel the group 'comp.arch.bus.vmebus' should not be created,
include the text:
"I vote NO for the creation of comp.arch.bus.vmebus."
Voting Rules:
- One vote per person. If you vote more than once, only the *last* of
those votes will count. Therefore if you change your mind about
the vote, you can send a new vote, which invalidates the old vote,
as long as it is within the voting period.
- Ambiguous votes will be invalidated.
Ambiguous votes contain neither YES nor NO, or contain both,
or are conditional, such as "I vote ... if ..."
- Votes posted to any newsgroup will NOT be counted.
- According to the USENET rules, in order for the new group to be created,
at least 2/3 of the votes must be "YES", and there must be at least 100
more "YES" votes than "NO" votes.
- For more details on the voting rules being followed, refer to article
in news.announce.newgroups.
Voting period:
Votes will be collected for a period beginning when this CFV is approved
for publication in news.announce.newgroups and ending at midnight on
Tuesday November 10, 1992. Votes received after the expiration of the
voting period will be discarded.
From [email protected] Wed Nov 4 10:19:50 1992
Xref: uunet news.announce.newgroups:2898 news.groups:58832 comp.robotics:3527 comp.realtime:2952 comp.sys.sun.hardware:5347 comp.lang.c:58349 comp.unix.wizards:7881 comp.sys.m68k:3556 comp.sys.misc:4233 comp.os.os9:3557 comp.lang.ada:9335 comp.os.vxworks:991
Newsgroups: news.announce.newgroups,news.groups,comp.robotics,comp.realtime,comp.sys.sun.hardware,comp.lang.c,comp.unix.wizards,comp.sys.m68k,comp.sys.misc,comp.os.os9,comp.lang.ada,comp.os.vxworks
Path: uunet!bounce-back
From: [email protected] (David B Stewart)
Subject: 2nd CFV: comp.arch.bus.vmebus
Keywords: VMEbus
Followup-To: poster
Approved: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected] (David C Lawrence)
Organization: The Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 1992 13:49:16 GMT
Message-ID:
Reply-To: [email protected]
Lines: 71
This is the second (and final) Call for Votes for the creation of a new
newsgroup for discussing VMEbus systems and related topics. The specifics of
the proposed newsgroup are given below, followed by the voting intructions and
rules.
Name: comp.arch.bus.vmebus
Purpose: Discussions of hardware and software for VMEbus Systems.
Status: Unmoderated
Charter: The newsgroup 'comp.arch.bus.vmebus' is a forum for discussing
issues related to developing VMEbus-based systems. This
includes discussion of VMEbus-based hardware, such as CPU
boards and I/O devices; the VMEbus specification; any alternate
or secondary buses supported by the VMEbus International Trade
Association (VITA) which includes FutureBus+, VSB, VXI, and
VMX; open-architecture applications based on the VMEbus; and
hardware-dependent software, such as device drivers and bus
communication protocols. The group is also available for
questions and answers, so that developers of VMEbus-based
hardware and software can get feedback or help with any
problems they may encounter.
Discussions should not be about hardware-independent software
which use the VMEbus, such as the operating system or language
being used, as there are other comp.* newsgroups dedicated to
those functions.
Voting Instructions:
All votes should be sent to .
Be sure to include the word "vote" in the subject line.
If you want the group 'comp.arch.bus.vmebus' to be created,
include the text:
"I vote YES for the creation of comp.arch.bus.vmebus."
If you feel the group 'comp.arch.bus.vmebus' should not be created,
include the text:
"I vote NO for the creation of comp.arch.bus.vmebus."
Voting Rules:
- One vote per person. If you vote more than once, only the *last* of
those votes will count. Therefore if you change your mind about
the vote, you can send a new vote, which invalidates the old vote,
as long as it is within the voting period.
- Ambiguous votes will be invalidated.
Ambiguous votes contain neither YES nor NO, or contain both,
or are conditional, such as "I vote ... if ..."
- Votes posted to any newsgroup will NOT be counted.
- According to the USENET rules, in order for the new group to be created,
at least 2/3 of the votes must be "YES", and there must be at least 100
more "YES" votes than "NO" votes.
- For more details on the voting rules being followed, refer to article
in news.announce.newgroups.
Voting period:
Votes will be collected until Tuesday November 10, 1992. Votes received
after the expiration of the voting period will be discarded.
From [email protected] Fri Nov 13 07:59:10 1992
Newsgroups: news.announce.newgroups,news.groups,comp.robotics,comp.realtime,comp.sys.sun.hardware,comp.unix.wizards,comp.sys.m68k,comp.sys.misc,comp.os.os9,comp.lang.ada,comp.os.vxworks
Path: uunet!uunet!bounce-back
From: [email protected] (David B Stewart)
Subject: RESULT: comp.arch.bus.vmebus passes 227:19
Keywords: VMEbus
Followup-To: news.groups
Approved: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected] (David C Lawrence)
Organization: The Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 10:16:08 GMT
Message-ID:
Lines: 291
Xref: uunet news.announce.newgroups:2951 news.groups:60361 comp.robotics:3634 comp.realtime:3001 comp.sys.sun.hardware:5631 comp.unix.wizards:8051 comp.sys.m68k:3609 comp.sys.misc:4269 comp.os.os9:3604 comp.lang.ada:9469 comp.os.vxworks:1029
Below is the result of votes received in the comp.arch.bus.vmebus
new group vote as of 00:01 EST 11 November 1992.
Vote Tabulation:
258 votes received
12 simple duplicates reduced to one each
19 no
227 yes
-------------
246 total
227 yes
- 19 no
-------------
208 margin (more than 100 more yes than no!)
227 / 246 = 0.920 = 92.0% (more than 2/3 [67%] in favor!)
Having met the declared criteria, it appears that the vote for
comp.arch.bus.vmebus has passed.
The list of voters, grouped by how they voted, and sorted by the "From:" line
of their email, appears below. If there are no substantial changes to the
recorded votes within the 5 days from the posting of this article, the group
creation message will be issued by David Lawrence (tale@uunet).
During the vote, 4 ambiguous ballots were received (with no indication of yes
or no in the headers or the message.) Simple email informing the voter that the
votes could not be counted were sent, and in each case a new valid vote
was sent by the voter.
Thanks to everyone who voted, and I look forward to some interesting
discussions in the future.
David B. Stewart
No votes (19)
=============================================================
AH Al_ashaab
Charles Shub
Eric J. Olson [2 votes reduced to 1]
Gerry Roston
Jon Lin
Sven M. Heinicke [2 votes reduced to 1]
[email protected]
[email protected] (Austin G. Hastings)
[email protected] (James Barrett)
[email protected] (Joe Brandt))
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected] (Paul Eggert)
[email protected] (Ed McGuire)
[email protected] (Gregory G. Woodbury)
[email protected] (Mike Park)
[email protected] (Murray Nesbitt) [2 votes reduced to 1]
[email protected] (Richard H. Miller)
[email protected] (Mikael Parknert)
Yes Votes (227)
==============================================================
[email protected]
Anay S. Panvalkar
Andre Somberg
Andy Jackson
Bob Foery
Bob Herlien
[email protected]
Brian Carlton
Brian Palmer
Brian e. Batson
Christoph Eck
[email protected]
DONALD MACKELLAR
David Lee
[email protected]
Denis Poussart
Edgar Perez
Edward McClanahan
Einar Sjaavik
[email protected]
[email protected] (Florian Wohlgemuth)
Glenn Kasten
HOGLE RICHARD A
Henning Pangels
James McIntosh
James Olsen
Jan Ekkel
Jian Huang
Jim Cockrell @ NSI
Joe Weintraub
John Heimbold
John Sauter
John M. Jourdain
Jon Kieffer
Jurriaan Vreeburg
Kai Atle Myrvang
Klaus Rennecke
[email protected] (Larry Anglin)
Mark Williams
Mark Wuest
Markus Traber
Matthieu Herrb
Meindert Kuipers
Michael M. O'Dorney
Michael Quinn
Ninane%[email protected]
Oded Ravid [2 'yes votes reduced to 1]
[email protected] [2 'yes votes reduced to 1]
Paul Wilkinson
Paul Qualtrough
Pete Lyall
Phil Kester
Pirawat Watanapongse [2 'yes' votes reduced to 1]
Reidar Strand
Remko van Driel
Rene Leiva
[email protected]
Robert J. Docktor
Rolf Dietze
Ron Fox
[email protected]
Sean Quinlan
Sinan Karasu
Steve Blachman
Steven King (503) 627-2736
Stuart Quick
Sundar Kuttalingam
Timothy J Chappell
Venneman John
Vincent Verleun
Vuorimaa Petri Kalevi
Walter E Miller @ NSI
[email protected]
[email protected] (Alex L. Bangs)
[email protected] (Adams)
[email protected]
[email protected] (Tony Poyner) [2 'yes votes reduced to 1]
[email protected] (barry n nelson)
[email protected] (Bob Bieszk) [2 'yes votes reduced to 1]
[email protected]
[email protected] (Alan K Biocca)
[email protected] (Bruce M. Walker)
[email protected] (Dietmar Budelsky)
[email protected] (Paul Butler)
[email protected] (Carl Lowenstein)
[email protected] (Alan Cheilek)
[email protected] (Chris Tilt)
[email protected] (Christian Lam)
[email protected] (Gianni Comoretto)
[email protected] (Robert Redfield)
[email protected] (Craig Conway)
crispen <@ada3.ca.boeing.com:[email protected]>
[email protected] (Rodney Cummings)
[email protected] (John Curry)
[email protected] (Brian Curtiss)
[email protected]
[email protected] (Carl Kalbfleisch)
[email protected] (Bill Sheppard)
[email protected] (Daniel R. Kegel)
[email protected] (Dave Peterson)
dawn%[email protected] (Dawn Stewart)
[email protected] (Dave Bruce)
[email protected] (harbison)
[email protected] (Darrell Call)
[email protected] (Dan Ciarlette)
[email protected] (David Kocinski)
[email protected] (Donald R. Newcomb)
[email protected]
[email protected] (Peter Dufault)
[email protected] (Don Wells)
[email protected] (Keith Neufeld)
[email protected] (Erik Plesner)
[email protected] (Albrecht Ernst)
[email protected] (Ed Rolfe)
[email protected] (Mike Geipel)
[email protected] (Ed Faught)
[email protected] (Floyd Miller)
[email protected] (Jens Ebert (69-6305-299))
[email protected] (Theresa Babrauckas)
[email protected] (john galloway) [2 'yes votes reduced to 1]
[email protected] (Ganesan)
[email protected] (Peter Faill)
[email protected]
[email protected] (Gerd Buntkowsky)
[email protected] (Steve Gilbert)
[email protected] (Greogry J. Nawrocki)
[email protected] (Glen Sescila)
[email protected] (Gordon Miller)
[email protected] (Gary Rima)
[email protected] (Gillian Groves)
[email protected] (Gerd Truschinski)
[email protected] (Guy Cole)
[email protected] (Harry Langenbacher)
[email protected] (Ron Heiby)
[email protected] (Heidi Frock)
[email protected] (Jeff Hill)
[email protected] (John Hodapp)
[email protected]
[email protected] (Mike Jablin)
[email protected] (Jaime Edwards)
[email protected] (John C. Peden)
[email protected] (Joe Finnivan)
[email protected] (Jim Horstkotte)
[email protected] (John E. Kreznar)
[email protected] (James D. Moudy)
[email protected] (Joe Smith)
[email protected] (Terry A. Jones)
jpmott%[email protected] (Jon Mott)
[email protected] (John Tillema)
jtwp%[email protected]
[email protected] (Kathryn Fielding)
[email protected] (Douglas Kemp)
[email protected] (Kevin Pammett)
[email protected] (Graulle Christophe)
[email protected]
[email protected] (Steve Lewis)
[email protected]
[email protected] (mark milligan)
[email protected] (Kenneth Mtz. (YONIX))
[email protected] (John Lengeling)
[email protected] (Mustafa Soysal)
[email protected]
[email protected] (Mohan J. Kumar)
[email protected] (Maxime Taksar KC6ZPS)
[email protected] (Mike Oliver)
[email protected] ("Mr. Mike" Passaretti)
[email protected] (Manish S. Vaidya)
[email protected] (David Muir Sharnoff)
[email protected] (Bill Sheppard)
[email protected] (Jeff Myer)
[email protected]
[email protected] (Norbert Nicolay)
[email protected] (G. Pardo-Castellote) [2 'yes votes reduced to 1]
[email protected] (Paul Antoine)
[email protected] (Patrick D. Wolf)
psm%[email protected] (Scot McIntosh)
[email protected]
[email protected] (Robert Belshe)
[email protected] (Raj Shelke)
rice%[email protected] (George Rice)
[email protected] (Rick Spanbauer)
[email protected] (Sylvain Riendeau 8573)
[email protected] (Bob McKenzie)
[email protected] (Robert Canik)
[email protected] (Bob Robison)
[email protected] (Glenn Robnett)
[email protected] (Benno Lange)
[email protected] (David Ross) [2 'yes votes reduced to 1]
[email protected]
[email protected] (ruman)
[email protected] (Peter Salerno)
[email protected]
[email protected] (David Sawey)
[email protected] (Seth A. Phillips)
[email protected] (Tian Shen)
[email protected]
[email protected] (Don Slater)
[email protected] (Steve M. Blumenau)
[email protected] ( Steve Broadstone)
[email protected] (Steve Morris)
[email protected] (Steve Rogers)
[email protected] (Flemming Stassen)
[email protected] (Steve Zanoni 5-4325)
[email protected] (Struck)
[email protected] (Stu Labovitz)
[email protected] (Tom Carey)
[email protected] (Ted Eggers)
[email protected] (Andy Thomson)
[email protected] (Richard E. Neitzel)
[email protected] (Tony Mountifield)
[email protected] (Ted Shannon) [2 'yes votes reduced to 1]
[email protected] (A.Lizard)
[email protected] (Joe VanAndel)
[email protected]
[email protected] ( Volker A. Brandt )
ward horner
[email protected] (Bill Brown) [2 'yes votes reduced to 1]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected] (Don Willey)
[email protected] (John R. Winans)
[email protected] (Isaac Wong)
[email protected]
[email protected] (Bill McDowell)
[email protected] (Dave Wybo)
[email protected] (yoshio nakamura)
[email protected] (Yves Boudreault)